...understands these expressions [in the Judiciary Act] to mean, that each distinct interest should be represented by persons, all of whom are entitled to sue, or may be sued, in the federal courts." Clearly there was nothing in the language of the Judiciary Act which pointed either way. Nor could...

...understands these expressions [in the Judiciary Act] to mean, that each distinct interest should be represented by persons, all of whom are entitled to sue, or may be sued, in the federal courts." Clearly there was nothing in the language of the Judiciary Act which pointed either way. Nor could...

...statute held : "The court understands these expressions to mean, that each distinct interest should be represented by persons, all of whom are entitled to...competent to sue, or liable to be sued, in those courts." ™ That Straw'bridgc does not constitute constitutional doctrine is strengthened by the fact that...

...understands these expres«<>7 US (3 Cranch) 267 (1806). sions to mean, that each distinct interest should be represented by persons, all of whom are entitled to sue, or may be sued, in the federal courts."151 There is nothing in the case to indicate that the Supreme Court intended to establish the...

...under the predecessor of the present diversity and alienage statute, "each distinct interest should be represented by persons, all of whom are entitled to sue, or may be sued, in the federal courts," 7 US (3 Cranch) at 267. or aliens on only one side but incomplete diversity between citizen adversaries...

...present diversity nnd alienage statute, "each distinct interest should 1-е represented t'y persons, nil of whom are entitled to sue, or may be sued. In the federal courts." 7 US (3 Cranch) at 267. or aliens on only one side but incomplete diversity between citizen adversaries...

...conclusion: "The court understands these expressions to mean, that each distinct interest could be represented by persons, all of whom are entitled to sue, or may be sued, in the federal courts."154 That is, all plaintiffs must be diverse from all defendants. This interpretation was certainly...

...claimed on the ground of diversity of citizenship of the parties, that: "Each distinct Interest should be represented by persons, all of whom are entitled to...competent to sue or liable to be sued. In those courts." See, also, Ex parte Girard, Fed. Cas. No. 5,457 ; Roberts v. Navigation Co. (CC) 104 Fed. 577. The...