A Debate on the Doctrines of Atonement, Universal Salvation, and Endless Punishment"Questions discussed. 1. Does gospel salvation embrace deliberance from just and deserved punishment? 2. Is there sufficient evidence for beliveing that all men will be finally holy and happy? 3. Is there sufficient evidence for believing that any part of the human family will suffer endless misery in a future state?" - pages [3] |
Other editions - View all
A Debate on the Doctrines of Atonement, Universal Salvation, and Endless ... David Holmes No preview available - 2017 |
Common terms and phrases
according allow argument asserts atonement attempt attributes Austin authority become believe Bible bring cause character Christ Christian claims conclusion condition course creatures death deny depravity designed desire destroy discussion divine doctrine earth effect Elder Holmes endless endless punishment eternal evidence evil existence express fact faith Father final follows forever future give given God's gospel hath heart heathen heaven hell Hence holiness and happiness human infinite inflicted influence insist Jesus judgment justice language light Lord means ment mind moral nature never object opponent passage perfect position present principles proof prove punishment question quoted reason reference regard remarks repentance respect result righteous salvation saved says scripture sense sinner sins soul suffering suppose teach theory things tion true truth Universalism Universalists unto views whole wicked
Bibliographic information
| Title | A Debate on the Doctrines of Atonement, Universal Salvation, and Endless Punishment |
| Authors | David Holmes, William G. Bishop (Reporter) |
| Publisher | Alden & Markham, 1848 |
| Original from | Harvard University |
| Digitized | 16 Jan 2007 |
| Length | 823 pages |
| Export Citation | BiBTeX EndNote RefMan |