| James Allan Park - Bottomry and respondentia - 1817 - 848 pages
...405. Ace. Aubcrt v. iM.i-.i-, 3 liov & Pull. 371. JLecs v. Smith, 7 Term R. 338. Mr. J. Heath. — " I am of the same opinion. It seems to me that the object of the statute would be totally defeated, if it were to extend only to those policies, in which... | |
| John Tidd Pratt - Law reports, digests, etc - 1833 - 392 pages
...fact due. I think it is sufficient, at least in this stage of the proceedings. • — TAUNTÓN J. I am of the same opinion. It seems to me that the term " excessive" implies that some poor rate was due. A copy of the warrant would have been of no... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Charles Crompton, Sir Charles John Crompton, Roger Meeson, Henry Roscoe - Law reports, digests, etc - 1835 - 1012 pages
...ordinary meaning of the word " occupy," which includes such a use of the land as that in question (a). ALDERSON, B. — I am of the same opinion. It seems to me that the words, " according to the custom of the country," refer to the mode of cultivation, and not to the... | |
| Great Britain. Bail Court, Alfred Septimus Dowling - Civil procedure - 1836 - 850 pages
...the 5th, which is positively contradicted, the ground of the motion fails. I think, therefore, that the rule should be discharged. ALDERSON, B. — I am of the same opinion. The service of the notice of declaration was correct, according to the practice. BOSTON v. SQUIRES.... | |
| Great Britain. Court of Exchequer, Roger Meeson, William Newland Welsby - Law reports, digests, etc - 1837 - 964 pages
...the landlord has sold them : how then can he complain of any damage ? GURNEY, B., concurred. ROLFE, B. — I am of the same opinion. It seems to me that the statute which has been referred to, the 56 Geo. 3, c. 50, throws some light upon this point: for the... | |
| Great Britain. Court of King's Bench - Justices of the peace - 1838 - 818 pages
...sessions have done right in quashing the rate, and that we must confirm their order. LITTLEDALE, J. — I am of the same opinion. It seems to me that the original exemption in () Geo. 1, is sufficiently extensive to exempt this land from poorrates, except... | |
| |