Decisions of the Commissioner of Patents and of the United States Courts in Patent and Trade-mark and Copyright CasesU.S. Government Printing Office, 1933 - Copyright "Compiled from Official gazette. Beginning with 1876, the volumes have included also decisions of United States courts, decisions of Secretary of Interior, opinions of Attorney-General, and important decisions of state courts in relation to patents, trade-marks, etc. 1869-94, not in Congressional set." Checklist of U. S. public documents, 1789-1909, p. 530. |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
18 C. C. P. A. Patents alleged apparatus appellant appellant's appellant's application appellee appellee's applicant's awarding priority Board of Appeals circuit cited color combination Commis Commissioner of Patents comprising conception confusingly similar connection construction contends cord circuit counts Court of Appeals Court of Customs Customs and Patent Decided device disclosed disclosure divisional application double patenting Electric element Examiner of Interferences fact filing date Held unpatentable Holtz Howard hypocycloidal interference proceeding inventor invertase involved issue machine manufacture mark material means mechanism metal operation opinion Ozone Company party Patent Appeals Patent Office Patent Office tribunals plate portion prior art priority of invention proceeding produced question record reduction to practice references registration rejected res adjudicata reviewed and Held shingle shows sioner of Patents specification subject matter supra surface T. A. Hostetler testimony tion tooth trade-mark tube U. S. Court United States Patent valve wire words
Popular passages
Page 76 - ... in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same : and in case of a machine, he shall explain the principle thereof, and the best mode in which he has contemplated applying that principle, so as to distinguish it from other inventions; and he shall particularly point out and distinctly claim the part, improvement, or combination which...
Page 287 - ... as to be likely to cause confusion or mistake in the mind of the public, or to deceive purchasers...
Page 462 - Provided, That no mark which consists merely in the name of an individual, firm, corporation, or association not written, printed, impressed, or woven in some particular or distinctive manner...
Page 564 - Defendant appeared specially for the purpose of objecting to the jurisdiction of the court, and...
Page 220 - That no mark by which the goods of the owner of the mark may be distinguished from other goods of the same class...
Page 146 - It is thus seen that by our practice a decree pro confesso is not a decree as of course according to the prayer of the bill, nor merely such as the complainant chooses to take it; but that it is made (or should be made) by the court, according to what is proper to be decreed upon the statements of the bill, assumed to be true.
Page 123 - Columbia, on complying with the conditions required in case of an appeal from the decision of the commissioner by an applicant for patent, or a party to an interference as to an invention, and the same rules of practice and procedure shall govern in every stage of such proceedings, as far as the same may be applicable.
Page 461 - That no mark which consists merely in the name of an individual, firm, corporation, or association, not written, printed, impressed, or woven in some particular or distinctive manner or in association with a portrait of the individual...
Page 427 - To entitle a party to the benefit of the act, in either case, there must be originality, and the exercise of the inventive faculty. In the one, there must be novelty and utility ; in the other, originality and beauty. Mere mechanical skill is insufficient. There must be something akin to genius — an effort of the brain as well as the hand. The adaptation of old devices or forms to new purposes, however convenient, useful or beautiful they may be in their new role, is not invention.
Page 339 - ... examination of the record leads us to the conclusion that there was credible evidence which amply supports the finding of the referee.