Emily. That is very fortunate; for it would be impossible to breathe the air in a solid mass; or even in a liquid state. But is the air a body of the same nature as other bodies ?

Mrs. B. Undoubtedly, in all essential properties. Emily. Yet you say that it does not possess one of the general properties of bodies-cohesive attraction ? Mrs. B. The particles of air are not destitute of the power of attraction, but they are too far distant from each other to be influenced by it; and the utmost efforts of human art have proved ineffectual in the attempt to compress them, so as to bring them within the sphere of each other's attraction, and make them cohere.

Emily. If so, how is it possible to prove that they are endowed with this power ?

Mrs. B. The air is formed of particles precisely of the same nature as those which enter into the composition of liquid and solid bodies, in which state we have a proof of their attraction.

Emily. It is then, I suppose, owing to the different degrees of attraction of different substances, that they are hard or soft; and that liquids are thick or thin?

Mrs. B. Yes; but you would express your meaning better by the term density, which denotes the degree of closeness and compactness of the particles of a body: thus you may say, both of solids, and of liquids, that the stronger the cohesive attraction the greater is the density of the body. In philosophical language, density is said to be that property of bodies by which they contain a certain quantity of matter, under a certain bulk or magnitude. Rarity is the contrary of density; it denotes the thinness and subtlety of bodies: thus you would say that mercury or quicksilver was a very dense fluid; ether, a very rare one, &c.

Caroline. But how are we to judge of the quantity of matter contained in a certain bulk ?

33. Does the attraction of cohesion exist in the air?-34. But are the particles of the air actually under the influence of this attraction?-35. Why are they not, if attraction belong to them?-36. How do we know that attraction does belong to the air if no influence is exerted upon it? -37. What is meant by the term density? - 38. What is meant by the term rarity? Mrs. B. By the weight: under the same bulk bodies are said to be dense in proportion as they are heavy. Emily. Then we may say that metals are dense bodies, wood comparatively a rare one, &c. But, Mrs. B., when the particles of a body are so near as to attract each other, the effect of this power must increase as they are brought by it closer together; so that one would suppose that the body would gradually augment in density, till it was impossible for its particles to be more closely united. Now we know, that this is not the case; for soft bodies such as cork, sponge, or butter, never become, in consequence of the increasing attraction of their particles, as hard as iron ?

of

Mrs. B. In such bodies as cork and sponge, the particles which come in contact are so few as to produce but a slight degree of cohesion: they are porous bodies, which, owing to the peculiar arrangement their particles, abound with interstices which separate the particles; and these vacancies are filled with air, the spring or elasticity of which prevents the closer union of the parts. But there is another fluid much more subtle than air, which pervades all bodies, this is heat. Heat insinuates itself more or less between the particles of all bodies, and forces them asunder; you may therefore consider heat and the attraction of cohesion, as constantly acting in opposition to each other. Emily. The one endeavouring to rend a body to pieces, the other to keep its parts firmly united.

Mrs. B. And it is this struggle between the contending forces of heat and attraction, which prevents the extreme degree of density whic would d result

from the sole influence of the attraction of cohesion.

Emily. The more a body is heated then, the more its particles will be separated.

Mrs. B. Certainly; we find that bodies swell or dilate by heat this effect, is very sensible in butter, for instance, which expands by the application of heat: till at length the attraction of cohesion is so far diminished that the particles separate, and the butter becomes liquid. A similar effect is produced by heat on metals, and all bodies susceptible of being melted. Liquids, you know, are made to boil by the application of heat: the attraction of cohesion then yields entirely to the expansive power; the particles are totally separated and converted into steam or vapour. But the agency of heat is in no body more sensible than in air, which dilates and contracts by its increase or diminution in a very remarkable degree. *

Emily. The effects of heat appear to be one of the most interesting parts of natural philosophy.

Mrs. B. That is true; but heat is so intimately connected with chemistry, that you must allow me to defer the investigation of its properties till you become acquainted with that science.

To return to its antagonist, the attraction of cohesion; it ⚫ is this power which restores to vapour its liquid form, which unites it into drops when it falls to the earth in a shower of rain, which gathers the dew into brilliant gems on the blades of grass.

Emily. And I have often observed that after a shower, the water collects into large drops on the leaves of plants; but I cannot say that I perfectly understand how the attraction of cohesion produces this effect.

Mrs. B. Rain does not fall from the clouds in the form of drops, but in that of mist or vapour, which is composed of very small watery particles; these in their descent, mutually attract each other, and those that are sufficiently near in consequence unite and form a drop,

* The expansive power of heat produces some of the most interesting phenomena in nature. The boiling of liquids, is the immediate result of this power; and the operation, although simple, is peculiarly worthy of notice. As the numerous particles become expanded or rarefied, they are continually rising to, and escaping from the surface, which occasions an agitation of the liquid, proportioned, in its violence, to the degree of heat operating on it. And on exposing our hands or other limbs to the fire, the internal fluid becomes expanded, which causes them to appear swollen; whereas, when exposed to the cold, the abstraction of the heat causes them to be compressed.

48. How are liquids made to boil by heat; or how is the тоt'on or agitation of boiling liquids produced?-49. Why are our hands and fingers swollen or larger on being held near the fire, than when exposed to the cold?-50. In what state does rain fall from the clouds? - 51. What collects this mist or vapour into drops?

The

and thus the mist is transformed into a shower. dew also was originally in a state of vapour, but is, by the mutual attraction of the particles, formed into small globules on the blades of grass: in a similar manner the rain upon the leaf collects into large drops, which, when they become too heavy for the leaf to support, fall to the ground.

Emily. All this is wonderfully curious! I am almost bewildered with surprise and admiration at the number of new ideas I have already acquired.

Mrs. B. Every step that you advance in the pursuit of natural science, will fill your mind with admiration and gratitude towards its Divine Author. In the study of natural philosophy, we must consider ourselves as reading the book of nature, in which the bountiful goodness and wisdom of God is revealed to all mankind; no study can then tend more to purify the heart, and raise it to a religious contemplation of the Divine perfections.

There is another curious effect of the attraction of cohesion which I must point out to you. It enables liquids to rise above their level in capillary tubes; these are tubes, the bores of which are so extremely small that liquids ascend within them, from the cohesive attraction between the particles of the liquid and the interior surface of the tube. Do you perceive the water rising above its level in this small glass tube, which I have immersed in a goblet full of water?

Emily. Oh yes; I see it slowly creeping up the tube, but now it is stationary; will it rise no higher?

Mrs. B. No; because the cohesive attraction between the water and the internal surface of the tube is now balanced by the weight of the water within it: if the bore of the tube were narrower, the water would rise higher; and if you immerse several tubes of bores of different sizes, you will see it rise to different heights in each of them. In making this experiment, you should colour the water with a little red wine, in order to render the effect more obvious.

All porous substances, such as sponge, bread, linen, &c. may be considered as collections of capillary tubes : if you dip one end of a lump of sugar into water, the water will rise in it; and wet it considerably above the surface of that into which you dip it.

Emily. In making tea I have often observed that effect without being able to account for it.

Mrs. B. Now that you are acquainted with the attraction of cohesion, I must endeavour to explain to you that of Gravitation, which is a modification of the same power; the first is perceptible only in very minute particles, and at very small distances; the other acts on the largest bodies, and extends to immense distances.

Emily. You astonish me: surely you do not mean to say that large bodies attract each other.

Mrs. B. Indeed I do: let us take, for example, one of the largest bodies in nature, and observe whether it does not attract other bodies. What is it that occasions the fall of this book, when I no it ?

longer support Emily. Can it be the attraction of the earth ? I thought that all bodies had a natural tendency to fall.

Mrs. B. They have a natural tendency to fall, it is true; but that tendency is produced entirely by the attraction of the earth; the earth being so much larger than any body, on its surface, forces every body, which is not supported, to fall upon it.

Emily. If the tendency which bodies have to fall results from the earth's attractive power, the earth itself can have no such tendency, since it cannot attract itself, and therefore it requires no support to prevent it from falling. Yet the idea that bodies do not fall of their own accord, but that they are drawn towards the earth by its attraction, is so new and strange to me, that I know not how to reconcile myself to it.

Mrs. B. When you are accustomed to consider the fall of bodies as depending on this cause, it will appear to you as natural, and surely much more satisfactory, than if the cause of their tendency to fall were totally unknown. Thus you understand, that all matter is attractive, from the smallest particle to the largest mass; and that bodies attract each other with a force proportional to the quantity of matter they contain.

Emily. I do not perceive any difference between the attraction of cohesion and that of gravitation: is it not be