 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1867 - 240 pages
...to us till 1st July thereafter ; so, it is not covered by Art. 2,244 of the Code., THE СОТШТ. I do not think it necessary to express any opinion on the doctrine enunciated by Mr. УАZEILLB (of which Mr. TBOPLOXG does not approve except under certain... | |
 | David Sutherland - India - 1892 - 856 pages
...decision referred to by Mr. Justice Markbv, and which governs the remaining cases, is a correct principle. I do not think it necessary to express any opinion on the question of limitation which is raised in appeals Nos. 238, 240, and 245. as those cases are also governed by... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1898 - 1414 pages
...Lordship's remarks. I cannot rest my opinion on the terms of the previous lease, or on the renunciation, or on any of the documents referred to, apart from...do not think it necessary to express any opinion on another question in regard to the competency of ascertaining, as matter of fact, the relations of the... | |
 | Henry Macaulay Fitzgibbon, James Henry - Land tenure - 1908 - 350 pages
...Massareenes' Estate, 40 Ir. LTR 16; Powell's Estate, 41 Ir. LTR 210. Cur. adv. vult. WYLIE, J. — I do not think it necessary to express any opinion on the general effect of s. 3 of the Act of 1903. The testator was absolute owner in fee, but as the proceedings... | |
 | Railroad law - 1923 - 474 pages
...fact that I think the conclusion reached by it may be supported on another ground. MIGNAULT, J. : — I do not think it necessary to express any opinion on the interesting question discussed in the Courts below whether the respondent was acting in the course... | |
 | Commercial law - 1920 - 526 pages
...dismissed with costs. As I do not think it necessary to find whether the helm signal was blown or not, I do not think it necessary to express any opinion on the conclusion of fact to which the Judge c;um- on that point. Lord Justice ATKIN «nd Lord Justice YOUNGKR... | |
 | New South Wales. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1910 - 1022 pages
...-General v. Barry Docks and Railway Co. (35 Ch. D. 573), in which different opinions were expressed. I do not think it necessary to express any opinion on the subject. I think that, if a highway were taken by the Crown which was the only means of access to alienated... | |
| |
it is called interest but is really damages." If the judge was meaning that such damages were not capable of being treated as interest, he was in my opinion guilty of an error in law, even before the Act of 1934. I do not think it necessary to express... 