Cases in which the value of the unknown quantity is indeterminate. 3. In what case would the denominators of the fractional values of the unknown quantities in example 41 of art. 94 become zero? and what is the corresponding absurdity of the enunciation? Ans. When an bm, and the absurdity is, that the ratio of two num- 4. In what case would the denominators of the fractional values of the unknown quantities in example 48 of art. 94 become zero? and what is the corresponding absurdity of the enunciation? Ans. When a = 0, and the absurdity is, that the squares of two 97. Corollary. When the solution of a problem gives for the value of either of its unknown quantities a fraction whose terms are each equal to zero, this value generally indicates that the conditions of the problem are not sufficient to determine this unknown quantity, and that it may have any value whatever. In some cases, however, there are limitations to the change of value of the unknown quantity. EXAMPLES. 1. In what case would both the terms of the fractional value of the unknown quantity in example 25 of art. 94 become zero? and how could this value be a solution? Cases in which the value of an unknown quantity is indeterminate. and these equations signify, that the couriers 2. In what case would both the terms of either of the fractional values of the unknown quantity in example 31 of art. 94 become zero? and how could this value be a solution? and these equations signify, that the bodies move But, in this case, all the algebraic values of 3. In what case would all the terms of the fractional values of the unknown quantities in example 38 of art. 94 become zero? and how could they, then, satisfy the conditions of the problem? and these equations signify, that the wines and Cases in which the value of an unknown quantity is indeterminate. value. But the values of the unknown quanti- 4. In what case would the terms of the fractional values of the unknown quantities in example 39 of art. 94 become zero? and how could they, then, satisfy the conditions of the problem? - and these equations signify, that the sum b of the 5. In what cases would all the terms of the fractional values of the unknown quantities in example 41 of art. 94 become zero? and how could they, then, satisfy the conditions of the problem? for these equations indicate that the two re quired numbers are only subject to the condition that their ratio = a : b. Secondly. When m = n, and a:b= m : n = m ; m = 1, that is, a = b; for these equations indicate that the two num- 6. In what case would all the terms of the fractional values of the unknown quantities in example 48 of art. 94 become zero? and how could these values be solutions? Cases of negative value of unknown quantity. Ans. When a = 0, and b = 0; and their equations indicate that the numbers 98. Corollary. When the solution of a problem gives a negative value to either of the unknown quantities, this value is not generally a true solution of the problem; and if the solution gives no other than negative values for this quantity, the problem is generally impossible. But, in this case, the negative of the negative value of the unknown quantity is positive; so that the enunciation of the problem can often be corrected by changing it, so that this unknown quantity may be added instead of being subtracted, and the reverse. EXAMPLES. 1. In what case would the value of the unknown quantity in example 25 of art. 94 be negative? why should it be so? and could the enunciation be corrected for this case? Ans. When a>b; that is, when the second courier goes slower 1 2. In what case would the values of the unknown quantities in examples 29, 31, 32 be negative? why should this be so? and could the enunciations be corrected for this case? Cases of negative value of unknown quantity. Ans. When c>C; that is, when the first body moves faster than the The enunciation may be corrected for this Examples 31 and 32 are not, however, impossible in this case; for, from the very nature of their circular motion, the first body is necessarily pursuing the second even in their present direction; the second body must not, however, be considered as a feet or a + c t feet behind the first, but as pa or p- (a+ct) feet before it. 3. In what cases would the values of the unknown quantity in example 33 of art. 94 be negative? why should this be the case? and could the enunciation be corrected for this case? Ans. First. When C<c, which is subject to the same remarks as in the Secondly. When C>c, and ct > a, or > p + a, or > 2 p + a, &c. ; that is, when the first body does not start until the second body has passed it once, or twice, or three times, &c.; and if the bodies were moving in the same straight line, the enunciation would not admit of legitimate correction. As it is, however, the first body is still pursued by the second, and is p + a - ct, 2 p + a - ct, &c. |