Arguments about Arguments: Systematic, Critical, and Historical Essays In Logical Theory

Front Cover
Cambridge University Press, Jul 25, 2005 - Philosophy - 467 pages
This book brings together a selection of essays by one of the pre-eminent scholars of informal logic. Following an approach that is empirical but not psychological, dialectical but not dialogical, and focused on interpretation without neglecting evaluation, Maurice Finocchiaro defines concepts such as reasoning, argument, argument analysis, critical reasoning, methodological reflection, judgment, critical thinking, and informal logic. He defends theses about the rarity of fallacies but the frequency of fallacious reasoning; the asymmetry of positive and negative in argumentation, interpretation, and evaluation; and the role of critical thinking in science, among other topics. And he presents extended critiques of the views of many contemporary scholars, while also integrating into the discussion Arnauld's Port-Royal Logic, Gramsci's theory of intellectuals, and case studies from the history of science, particularly the work of Galileo, Newton, Huygens, and Lavoisier.
 

Contents

1987
34
Methodological Problems in Empirical Logic 1989
46
Two Empirical Approaches to the Study of Reasoning
65
Critical Thinking Critical Reasoning
92
Fallacies and the Evaluation of Reasoning 1981
109
Toward a Realistic Theory
128
Asymmetries in Argumentation and Evaluation 1992
148
The Positive versus the Negative Evaluation of Arguments
159
Johnstones
277
Goldman
292
The Concept of Ad Hominem Argument in Galileo
329
A Role for Logic
340
Toward
350
The Concept of Judgment and Huygens Theory
361
Toward
386
Criticism Reasoning and Judgment in Science 1995
409

Reasoning versus Rationality
181
Induction and Intuition in the Normative Study
193
Intellectuals Dialectics
207
The Dialectical Approach to Interpretation
231

Other editions - View all

Common terms and phrases

Bibliographic information