| New Jersey. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1839 - 658 pages
...money received on bills remitted to the defendants, with instructions to pay the plaintiff, was not money had and received by the defendants to the use of the plaintiff, until the defendants by some act on their part, had recognized the right of the plaintiff... | |
| Great Britain. Court of King's Bench, Charles Durnford - Law reports, digests, etc - 1817 - 860 pages
...paid to the plaintiffs, and delivered the bill so indorsed to them. There There were also other counts for money had and received by the defendants to the use of the plaintiffs : for money paid, laid out, and expended by the plaintiffs to the use of the defendants ; and for money lent... | |
| United States. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1817 - 528 pages
...agreements between the parties for the payment of the bills ; others general, among which is a count for money had and received by the Defendants, to the use of the Plaintiff. the Defendants for collection. The amount, when colr. lected, was to be placed to the ci«dit... | |
| Mungo Ponton Brown - Contracts - 1821 - 656 pages
...principles from , those by which it is regulated in our law, Supra, No. 26. The first case was an action for money had and received by the defendants to the use of the plaintiffs, in which a verdict was found for the plaintiffs for LI 415, subject to the opinion of the court upon... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1829 - 964 pages
...produce ; and, in the loiter case, the creditor nill not be entitled to set off his old debt. Assumpsit for money had and received by the defendants to the use of the bankrupts before their bankruptcy, and to that of the assignees after the bankruptcy. Plea — The... | |
| Ohio. Supreme Court - Law reports, digests, etc - 1832 - 976 pages
...that the money was received to the plaintiff's use. Had the declaration contained but a single count for money had and received by the defendants, to the use of the plaintiff, the receipt which is referred to in the present case, would have been good evidence under... | |
| |